If you pull your MLS numbers by property type instead of looking at the market as one blob, you may find something uncomfortable: your single-family segment looks reasonably healthy, and your attached segment looks like a different city entirely. Longer days on market. Deeper price cuts. More listings that expire and quietly come back with a new number and a new agent.
This divergence has been building for a couple of years, and it's not evenly distributed. Some markets barely feel it. Others — especially those with older condo stock, coastal exposure, or heavy investor concentration — are seeing attached inventory pile up while detached homes still get multiple offers. If you work both segments the same way, you're going to mistake a structural problem for a pricing problem, and you'll burn through your seller's goodwill trying to solve it with reductions alone.
What's actually driving the split
The short version: the monthly cost of owning a condo has climbed faster than the price of the condo itself, and buyers do the math on the total payment, not the sale price.
Three forces are stacking on top of each other. HOA dues have risen across most markets as associations absorb higher insurance premiums, labor costs, and maintenance backlogs. Special assessments have become more common, particularly in buildings that deferred capital projects during the cheap-money years and are now facing them at current construction prices. And lender scrutiny of condo projects has tightened considerably — buildings with insufficient reserves, deferred maintenance findings, pending litigation, or high investor concentration can end up non-warrantable, which shrinks a buyer's financing options overnight.
None of that shows up on a listing sheet. It shows up when a buyer gets 14 days into due diligence, reads the reserve study, and walks.
Diagnose your own market before you assume anything
National commentary is useless here. The condo story in a Sun Belt high-rise market has almost nothing in common with the condo story in a Midwest townhome community with $180 monthly dues. Spend an hour with your MLS and run these side by side, single-family versus attached, for the last 12 months:
- Months of supply by property type. If detached is at three months and attached is at eight, you are working two different markets and should be advising clients accordingly.
- Median days on market, and the gap between them. Watch whether the gap is widening quarter over quarter. That trend line matters more than the absolute number.
- Percentage of listings with at least one price reduction. This tends to move before days on market does.
- Sale-to-list ratio. A widening spread between segments tells you where negotiating leverage has shifted.
- Failed and relisted transactions. If attached properties are going under contract and falling out at a materially higher rate, the problem is happening in due diligence — financing, HOA docs, or insurance — not in pricing.
Then go one level deeper. Within your attached inventory, separate buildings and communities by age and dues level. In most markets that shows a clean split: newer construction with modest dues and funded reserves still moves fine, while older buildings carrying deferred maintenance sit. That distinction is the whole ballgame, and it's what lets you tell a seller something more useful than "the condo market is slow."
If you're taking an attached listing
Do the diligence work before you go live, not after you're under contract. This is the single biggest adjustment agents need to make in the current environment.
Request the association's current budget, the most recent reserve study, the last 12 months of board meeting minutes, the insurance certificate, and any assessment history or pending assessment discussion. Read the minutes. That's where you'll find out about the roof project the board has been arguing about for eight months. Find out the owner-occupancy ratio and whether any single entity owns more than the threshold that would trip up conventional financing.
Then have an honest conversation with your seller. If the building has a known issue, you have two options: price it into the number from day one, or get ahead of it with documentation and a lender who has already reviewed the project. What doesn't work is listing at detached-market optimism and discovering the problem on day 32 with a buyer whose loan just got declined.
It also pays to build a short list of lenders who actively do condo lending in your area, including portfolio lenders who can handle non-warrantable projects. Being able to hand a buyer's agent a name that will actually close is worth more than another open house.
If you're working with a buyer
Attached inventory is where the negotiating room is right now, and that's genuinely good news for the right buyer. A well-managed building with funded reserves in a soft attached market can be a legitimately strong buy. Your job is separating those from the ones that will hand your client a five-figure assessment next spring.
Teach your buyers to underwrite the payment, not the price. Principal, interest, taxes, HOA dues, and the individual insurance policy — then ask what dues have done over the past three years and what the reserve study says about the next five. A unit that's $30,000 cheaper but carries $300 more in monthly dues is not cheaper.
Push the document review as early in the contract timeline as you can negotiate, and make sure your inspection and financing contingencies give you room to act on what you find. If your state's disclosure regime gives buyers a review period on association documents, treat it as a hard deadline you actually work, not a formality.
What this means for your business
Two practical implications. First, your marketing and your market updates should stop treating your area as one market. Agents who publish segment-specific commentary — attached versus detached, by price band, by community — sound informed in a way that generic "the market is shifting" posts never do. That's a differentiator with sellers who have already read the national headlines and want to know what it means for their building.
Second, condo expertise is intensely local and building-specific. If a past client calls about buying a unit in a market you don't cover, you're not in a position to evaluate that building's finances, and pretending otherwise puts your client at real risk. That's exactly the kind of transaction worth handing to an agent who knows which buildings in that market are well-run and which ones have a bad roof and no money to fix it. If you want a bench of agents you can call in markets you don't cover, building out your referral network is worth the hour it takes to set up.
The two-speed market isn't going to resolve quickly — reserve funding and insurance costs move on multi-year timelines. Agents who understand the mechanics behind the split will keep closing attached deals while everyone else keeps cutting prices and wondering why it isn't working.